000			02123 a a2200253 04500
001			12430
008			230124b ||||| |||| 00| 0 spa d
020			_aISSN 1520295X
082	0		_a624.1762 _bR331
245	0		_aRedars validation report / _cSungbin Cho ... [et al.]
260	4		_aNew York: _bUniversity at Buffalo, _c2006
300	4		_a133 p.
504	4		_aIncluye bibliografía p. 101
505	4		_aThis report represents the results of an extensive review and evaluation of the Seismic Risk Assessment (SRA) methodology for highway systems documented in Werner et al. (2000). The research team evaluated the efficacy of all key modules in the REDARS (Risk of Earthquake Damage for Roadway Systems) software program. The modules included bridge damage or fragility, post-earthquake traffic state, transportation, and economic loss. The reader should note that the version of REDARS evaluated in this study has since been updated based largely on the conclusions and recommendations of this report. Some of the key recommendations identified in the study include: 1)uncertainty factors in the bridge fragility module, 2) additional events - beyond the 1994 Northridge earthquake - should be incorporated in the validation and/or calibration of the different loss modules, 3) further investigation of the traffic state model, particularly, in the relationship between link importance and duration of bridge closure should be conducted, 4) the travel demand model should be enhanced so that congestion level becomes a critical factor in establishing demand, 5) a more realistic post-earthquake route choice model should be developed, and 6) other significant cost items should be included in future enhancements of REDARS
650			_aRIESGO SISMICO EN CARRETERAS _959360
650			_aRIESGO SISMICO EN PUENTES _959361
650			_aINGENIERIA SISMICA _959362
700	4	0	_aCho, Sungbin _957663
700	4	0	_aHuyck, Charles K. _911105
700	4	0	_aGhosh, Shubharoop _959363
700	4	0	_aEguchi, Ronald T. _911107
942			_2ddc _cBK
999			_c11102 _d11102